Continental ProContact GX came original OEM with my 2014 2.5i Outback Premium. The tires have 48,000 miles on them. Rotated every oil change. They have just under 50% tread life on them. Driven on Chicago streets 10% the other 90% on the highway. Tire pressure kept at recommended levels per sticker on vehicle. The tires tracked true on the highway with zero steering play. In the snow, from just a dusting to 2 plus feet, they were awesome. From hot summer to sub-zero driving these tires always felt connected to the road. Tires went to the Colorado Mountains and through the deep south, no issues. My Subaru maintained at dealer for all recommended service requirements. I am replacing current tires with OEM for the winter snow and keeping the the original tires for the summer.

I bought my chevrolet trax 2016 with continental tires on it, and im running about 70k km now. But still in good shape! Great performance on wet season and on sharp curves.

Tires were supposed last 65K. They wore out at 32K. I drive a 2014 2.5i Outback very modestly and am very surprised by the poor tread life. The tire life was so poor not sure that they were new when I bought my car. Worst tire life I have experienced on a car in decades given the type of tire.

Vehicle = 2013 Subaru 2.5 limited. I replaced the Coni Procontact with the Porcontacyt GX. The problem I'm seeing is that the GX version has a harder ride. It transmits the cracks and expansion joints as if my tires are overinflated. Yes I checked the pressure many times.

These came on my new vehicle. I have been to the dealership 5 times for balancing. At 2,500 miles they finally replaced 2 of the 4 tires due to their inablity to "balance the tires within their specs". I still have vibrations in the vehicle and it just rolled over 5000 miles and I am being told all of it has to do with these tires. I am very unhappy with these tires and with what I have read about tread life, doesn't look like it will change.

I took my 2016 Mercedes C300 all wheel drive (they should wear more evenly) with 31K on it to the dealer for an oil change and they told me my front tires are well beyond recommend tread and below the indicator. They can't be rotated due to the staggered rim. The rear have marginal left. These are extremely expensive tires. This is the worst tire I have ever experienced.

Sadly, I do not recommend these tires. I have 28,000 miles and I was told by the mercedes service department and by Les Schwab that the tires need to be replaced. This is ridiculous that they need to be replaced already. I am not hard on my tires or car. As a matter of fact, I am a cautious driver. These Continentals should have lasted much longer.

I wish the dealership would have told me that the tires that came on my 2016 C300 had to different sizes and I would have never bought this car. I am now replacing tires after only 24,000 miles which I think is unheard of unless you race your cars which I do not

I gave. 2107 Mercedes C300 with less than 20k miles! I'm standing in the tire shop and they are telling me both rear tires need to be replaced! Worst tire wear I have ever experienced!

I have had too many new cars to count and have driven too many miles to say. I take excellent care of my autos, which includes regular tire rotation and checking the air pressure frequently. These tires were original to my 2014 Subaru Outback 3.6. I have never had a car where the new tires only lasted 24,700 miles. My kids have Hyundais and they have over 50,000 miles on their Kumho Solus KL21 tires. I rec'd no help from Subaru nor Continental Customer Service. I was told by Continental they only warranty replacement tires. The warranty on the same tire I paid for with my new car gets a 6 yr/65,000 mile waranty if purchased as a replacement. Does that make sense to anyone? Something is fishy. Are the tires substandard that are put on new cars - either specified by the auto manufacturer or deliberately provided this way by the tire manufacturer?