I am very dissatisfied with the new product. The large is NOT a true "large" size. It seems like it should be labeled as a "medium" with the way it fits. The absorbency is terrible as they do not absorb so well as the older version and requires more changes, which is most likely why this change to the original version was made. Use more, buy ore. I am very dissatisfied with your new product.

Great to wear to sporting events, concerts, or a marathon. You don’t need to worry about missing the best part of the event anymore. Feel confident knowing you are protected by the best adult diaper on the market today! So go on have those 6 additional beers and have no fear cause you are protected by the best gear.

I purchased these at SAM'S because they didn't have Membersmark Unisex Size XL,which I wanted! BIG MISTAKE!!! These are So THIN, Poor Quality and NOT worth the MONEY. NOW I will Have to Order from some Company online, rather than run up the street one block to SAM'S.I am so Disappointed! WCager

Even with your new explanations on sizing and your apology to us all who used this product. I still am in the same size - still a problem in leakage -. For a product I have used many years and so happy with. I could not be more discouraged and sad.

Extremely disappointed in the change in Member’s Mark incontinence underwear – the sizing is obviously much smaller. My 96 year-old mother (wears a size 16-18 pants) has been wearing this brand in Large for a long time. The previous version (in the pink/purple box) fit comfortably and she could easily put them on herself. This new version (in the purple box) is visibly smaller and a struggle for her to pull on.

They changed the sizes. Now I have to get a XL and not a L. They said it was a repackage. Now just a marketing ploy. They wanted to put less in the package. Also they now leak and they are still almost to small. This is ridiculous and they knows what it going on. Less quality less material.

Member's mark total protection underwear xl. Why would you change a product that worked? From My perspective it was a product that you had difficulty keeping in stock. So obviously it was a good selling product. The new members mark xl disposable underwear are now too small and is not absorbent at all. Cheaply and poorly redesigned. It is a real shame when something that worked was changed to save money producing. I am sure it will be a major money loss for Sam's club in the long term. I will gladly pay more money for the assurance of a total protection underwear. Tena will be my go to for Positive Total Protection Disposable Underwear.

This is one of the worst decisions Sam's Member Mark has made. These are horrible, I wouldn't recommend them as they leak horrible. I feel horrible for my loved one who has no choice but to use them. You really should rethink this decision, or go back to drawing board

I bought these in June thinking that bulk would do better than an online brand. For me, the need is due to the side effects of surgery. These are not highly absorbent or total protection. Unfortunately, as soon as I realize that I have to go and I begin to move, my bladder releases. What I noticed is that when I can't move fast enough, and I'm still on my back in bed, urine leaks through. My bed pads have saved me a few times, but not often. Also, once I'm standing, if I don't make it to the bathroom, I noticed that urine leaks down my legs. These haven't been the most pleasant experience, but at least I know. I get the concept of being discreet, but the padding isn't as thick as I need it to be to keep me accident free. Moreover, because of the slimmer design, I can't keep them on when I have a slight accident. I'm already more than half through the pack, so I'll likely have to go back to the other brand. I'd recommend this product for light accidents, but not overnight or for someone who has a difficult time getting to the restroom without the possibility of leaking.

These used to really good and economical. But now they are a waste of valuable room in my bathroom cabinet. For some unknown reason(s) somebody changed: * the softness of the material * the cut/configuration of the entire brief * the butt cuppage * the stretchability * the positioning and capacity of the pad * the comfortability. And, as a result I am now sitting on my sofa in a brief that is: * crawling up my butt (talk about being uncomfortable!) * wet with sweat * wet with peepee * is costing me more because each brief lasts a shorter length of time and requires more changes per day.They