I love these pullups. They are easy to change, love the design and they absorb well. I would recommend these to a friend. I buy this brand over any other brand.

[This review was collected as part of a promotion.] Not as absorbent. Wish it came with different character choices. The price for the amount of pull ups you get is to high especially having 2 children that wears them

[This review was collected as part of a promotion.] My son loves Thomas the Train. He is very excited to potty train when there is a character that he loves on his training pants.

I started with Pampaes Swaddlers, moved on to Cruisers and now were using Easy Ups. All the Pampers products I've used have been great so I knew the Easy Ups would be good. They fit really well and make potty training a brezze.

[This review was collected as part of a promotion.] We really like these compared to pull-ups because they do not have Velcro on the sides to scratch my sons legs however They still easily tear away

Easy-ups are the only trainers I use! Both my boys get a rash from every other trainer, even the expensive organic brand. I love that they are soft on the outside, too. Not so noisy, like other training pants.

Really good diapers but not as good as the girl kind but the boy kind has better designs with Thomas so Thank You Pampers and overall it can absorb so GREAT and the price is cheap and can fit all up to 5 or older

Just started using these on my little boy! He is excited about the characters on the front. Hope they work as well as the girls version did for my daughter

The designs are great. The easy ups Can get difficult to take down if your child has made a mess in them. I wish they had the side tabs like Huggies New slip ons. They do well during the day but not amazing protection throughout the night

The "panties" make her feel like a big girl since she can pull them up and down on her own. It's just a matter of time before she will be pooping in the potty but the clean-up isn't difficult. Where were these "gems" when my daughters were little?