(Before reading the review: I’ve attached a photo of my hair using the Shark and Dyson. You can take a guess which side [right/R or left/L] was which device and I’ll put the answer at the end of the review).
After some research, I decided to buy the Shark primarily due to cost and the twist feature. (Also just to note, I really only wanted one of these hair styling devices for the curls/blowout look, so I will mainly be focusing on the “wrap” attachment and regular blow drying since those were the two functions I used before I ultimately decided to return it). First, things I like about it. The twist. Made regular blow drying so easy and similar to how one would use a regular blow dryer. When using the barrel attachment, the hold was strong. Once my hair was wrapped it did not move until the device was turned off. Cord was long. Different types of attachments, such as a diffuser which the Dyson does not come with. Second, the eh. I didn’t really believe the other reviews, but the Shark is a tad noisier than the Shark. I feel like that has more to do with the way the air comes out of the barrel - it’s stronger? and therefore louder than the Dyson. With the Dyson, it was primarily just loud at the filter end. But all hair dryers are loud, so how much of a difference noise makes is a personal preference. The buttons felt somewhat inconveniently placed. Cool shot is in the middle and other buttons are on the bottom. Sometimes I had difficulty feeling for the cool shot button. Felt like it was too far from the off switch. Would just but quicker and more convenient to not have to not constantly have to slide my hand up and down for the buttons. Finally, what I didn’t like. The two separate barrel attachments, only having one barrel width option, and no “long” barrel option for long hair. I have fairly long hair, and I felt that the barrel needed to be a bit longer to work better for me. It also would be way more convenient IMO to just be able to switch airflow direction like with the Dyson. The Shark did get really hot, and I was reading that Shark doesn’t really have an internal temperature monitor like the Dyson does. Part of the appeal of these devices is the “less heat damage” aspect, though heat is heat but we do what we can. I did feel like the Dyson did not get as hot, which could be good or bad depending on how you look at it.
Answer to the photo: Left was Dyson, Right was Shark. Personally, I didn’t like the results of the Shark side the next day. Just to note, with the Dyson, I used the smallest diameter long length barrel. Obviously, I used the only barrel option Shark came with. I can’t remember if the diameters were the same or not, but I set both sides with hairspray and slept with my hair above my head as to not crush the curls. My hair was almost straight on the Shark side. Both times I used the Shark the waves fell so flat. For those results, it wasn’t worth the time and effort.
TLDR: I ultimately decided to return the Shark. Didn’t like the results. Didn’t like the medium length (compared to original and long length barrels for Dyson) barrel, just too short for my long hair. Didn’t like having to change barrels for each side. Didn’t like the level of noise it produced. Buttons IMO inconveniently placed. Heat intensity questionable. I did like the swivel feature, more ergonomic. I did like the different types of attachments Included. I liked the price compared to Dyson.