Prior to the new sizing my mother wore size S/M. Now size M is too small, but according to the sizing guide size L would be much too large for her. Also, the padding is much thinner, causing her to have to use twice as many as before. Please bring back the old product; it was perfect.

Even with your new explanations on sizing and your apology to us all who used this product. I still am in the same size - still a problem in leakage -. For a product I have used many years and so happy with. I could not be more discouraged and sad.

I have been buying Member's Mark Underwear for my Mother for awhile now. She said they were the best of all she's ever used, comfortable, perfect fit and held in liquid. These were recently changed and supposedly only the packaging and sizes were going to change, but they are NOT the same. It is a completely different material (kind of fuzzy) that rips easily and the new sizing allows for easy leakage. I'm very disappointed as Member's Mark had been a guaranteed solution for her and I upgraded my membership to get free monthly shipping of them. Now I have to start looking for another brand.

I am very dissatisfied with the new product. The large is NOT a true "large" size. It seems like it should be labeled as a "medium" with the way it fits. The absorbency is terrible as they do not absorb so well as the older version and requires more changes, which is most likely why this change to the original version was made. Use more, buy ore. I am very dissatisfied with your new product.

Our most recent purchase of the Underwear for Women Medium size is now smaller than all prior purchases! Member's Mark needs to scrutinize the manufacturing process, to verify that the size does not vary over time. This item is a great value and highly-valued -- but the size must be accurate.

I bought these for my 85yr old mother in law. I followed the size quide and it said she would wear a small. Took these home and waisted at least 5 trying to get them pulled up on her. They ripped every time. I was very disappointed and returned them. I will go back to buying the Walmart brand that I know fits and won't tear every time we put one on.

I have always purchased MM briefs for my 106 yr old mother. When I saw the changed box and additional sizes, I followed the sizing chart and she fit into the "Small " category. I purchased 2 boxes. I was totally disappointed to find that they were too small for her frail frame and ripped as I tried to put them on. The quality is terrible and the absorbency is not what it used to be. I will be returning the unused product and buying at BJ's in the future.

This is one of the worst decisions Sam's Member Mark has made. These are horrible, I wouldn't recommend them as they leak horrible. I feel horrible for my loved one who has no choice but to use them. You really should rethink this decision, or go back to drawing board

Member's mark total protection underwear xl. Why would you change a product that worked? From My perspective it was a product that you had difficulty keeping in stock. So obviously it was a good selling product. The new members mark xl disposable underwear are now too small and is not absorbent at all. Cheaply and poorly redesigned. It is a real shame when something that worked was changed to save money producing. I am sure it will be a major money loss for Sam's club in the long term. I will gladly pay more money for the assurance of a total protection underwear. Tena will be my go to for Positive Total Protection Disposable Underwear.

Good price and I add for my elderly mother a secondary pad which has eliminated any leakage at bedtime. The optional addition of MM pads ensure clothing and bedding stay dry and clean. Having it shipped as a plus member makes it convenient and a no brained for continued purchase