I had never purchased Michelin tires before. We have had quieter road noise and much better driving stability on dry and wet roads. Due to computer on the car we were constantly needing to fill up with air, and when we bought the Michelin tires we changed to the nitrogen fill. No more red lights of "low tire pressure". I plan only to purchase Michelin tires from now on if financially feasible.

I have purchased Michelins for many years on many vehicles and have been very happy with durability and noise reduction. Not this time, however. I have a 2018 Honda Clarity with 32,000 miles on it. I'm not a hard driver. Two of the tires had to be replaced because of nails at 20,000 miles. Never had this before, but can't blame Michelin. The other two original Michelins now have 32,000 miles on them and are down to a "3" and need replacement. This is not acceptable.

This tire came standard on my 2010 Mercury Milan Hybrid. I now have a 2011 Lincolin MKZ Hybrid with the same tires and they are perfect. I can't speak for the durability yet, but am confident they will deliver great durability as all my Michelin's have in the past. They are unequaled for quietness, smoothness and handling.

Bought these for my Prius at 83k miles. 130k now and still have decent tread left. Rountinely rotated, they have worn very well and delivered excellent mileage. Handling and braking are very good....but it's a Prius, not a Corvette. I will buy these again.

I put 100K miles on a set of Michelin XZX radials on a Ford Fiesta years ago, perfect wear pattern, topped 49.5 MPG, lifetime average 38.5 MPG. My 2008 Ford Escape got a nail in the tread at 78,801 miles with about 10K miles left on the tires. The nail was not fixable, so got new Energy AS tires. They were replacing Michelin tires Ford put on the car. I noticed these tires are quiet and they do seem to coast smoother, handling is good but in the interest of fuel mileage I don't break hard, start fast, just cruise and look ahead. The V6 Escape is breaking in, averaging around 26 MPG combined driving, better than 32 on open road. I will be back to report on these tires and thier mileage in about 10K of use. The mileage average better be good, I will maintain my driving habits. I will have to drive them for a year before I really praise or criticize these tires they seem better than the Michelins they replaced. 60MPH Cruiser

These tires came stock on my 2015 C-Max Hybrid SEL... They took about 2000 miles to wear in and the mileage was about 43 mpg. They don't have that great dry or wet road traction. My little 2 liter non turbo engine can easily break them loose anytime. They slide around too easily in the rain and can be scary at times. They are predictable and you know what to expect, but for the money and the way they advertize, these tires could be way better. They wear way too fast too, and I am 65 and drive easy. The Michelins I used years ago were way better tires in rain and snow and would last 90 thousand miles. I don't know why they are so poor now, but it's time to look for other tires. My last hybrid had Michelin tires too and they had bad delamination of the tread at 18k miles. Michelin replaced them all, but the new ones they gave me handled poorly too and I traded in the car. I had Continental tires come stock on my hybrid before that one and they also wore quickly, even worse than the Michelins, but they stuck like glue to the wet and dry roads, and I was never afraid to drive in the winter with them. Braking was also better. Tires could be so much better than they are these days. With all the scientific advancements these days, why did tires get worse? Because they want them to be worse! Bad Michelin!

This is 5th set of Michelins for me and the Energy Saver was recommended as replacement for Michelins as original tires on Honda Accord. Less tire noise by half and no visible wear in 16,000 miles. I believe tread design gives me better traction and handling. Rotated and air checked regularly by tire dealer. Will buy again....

I bought these energy saving A/S for 2011 CRV. These tires ride comfortably. The tread wear is between 7/32 and 8/32 at 20000 miles. I should get close to the 65,000 mile guarantee. The gas mileage is not great on the interstate. I get about 25 mpg+/-. I drive the speed limit plus 5 mph+ over. If I stayed at the posted speed limit, I could do better. I will wear this set out, but I will certainly consider the defender the next time. The energy saver a/s 225/65/17 only has a 100 T rating. This was the only tire available in Michelin, when I bought them in February 2012. The defender comes with the 102 T rating and a 90000 mile warranty. The price differential is not that much more between the two tires, so both will be considered at the next tire purchase. Overall great tire. I have had the tires rotated every 6, 000 miles and have had the alignment checked twice a year.

This is the third car that I have purchased these tire to replace the original tires. I have a small car and these tires greatly reduced road noise. I like the handling and the all season aspect of these. I will be purchasing a set for my other car in a few months.

Orginal tires on 2014 honda accord hybrid. Tires are quiet for the first 2.5-3 years, noise gets louder as it wears around 42k. Not happy in wet weather seems to hydroplane in real wet weather in california, new and older. Wear is good and still have tread at 51k but looking to change tires this winter to another version of michelin. Gas mileage average i saw no significant difference from what the vehicle new car sticker stated. Overall ride intially are great and smooth and fair. Lightly stiff ride and firm great traction on dry roads and corners good.