I have been wearing Members Mark for years, love them....UNTIL I bought two pair a few weeks ago. First thing I noticed was the missing belt loops. Seriously. Those belt loops allow the jeans to fit better and keep the belt off your skin. But the feel is terrible. I thought they needed to be worn and washed a couple of times. Still hated them. Then I read the label. Stretch material is incorporated into the fabric. Nope, they are going back. Totally messed up a great pair of jeans. Will have to find another brand that feels better than this.

I bought two pair to try them out. I was a big fan of the previous version and was hoping these would be a good alternative. Boy was I wrong. These felt tight in the legs and were not nearly as comfortable as the previous Member's Mark Levis. But the worst was both pair blew out the back side. I have never had pants do that. It took very little force as I was not aware they were ripped until I took them off and saw the huge tare. So embarrassing I was walking around in public like that.

These jeans seem to be well-made and sturdy. My only issue is that the rise is shorter than that of name-brand jeans. They weren't advertised as low-rise and I don't think they are. They are somewhere between mid-rise and low-rise. Just a little uncomfortable.

These are very thigh jeans and very thin material if you want to peel them off fand to show off your manly body then there are for you. For work jeans these will not hold up. The regular member mark jeans were great but no longer list on the web site and had a great fit. Pass on these.

I purchased this product previously and it was much more comfortable. It was made in Mexico then. The new product is made in Bangladesh. The jeans are probably made using less material. They are too tight and feel shorter from crotch to belt loop. I am sure the less material suggestion is correct since the previous jeans made in Mexico have seven belt loops and these new jeans have five belt loops. Please bring back the original jeans even if you have to charge more for extra material.

I have worn Member's Mark Jeans for probably over 15 years, and they were fantastic. Good quality fabric, good fit, choice between blue and "stone washed", and even had two side-by-side belt loops in the very back which at first I thought was just a novelty but turned out to be rather useful. Now they only have these "stretchy" jeans that are a much thinner fabric, don't fit as well (the waist, or top of the jeans don't come up as high as the older jeans), and they just don't feel like jeans that would be worn to do any sort of work in. Very disappointing, and I will likely need to find a new source.

Disappointed in these jeans. I was unable to find mens Membersmark jeans at my local clubs so I decided to order them online. These jeans are definitely not the same jeans I used to buy at the Sam’s Club store, they are very thin denim and the fit is terrible, low rise and very uncomfortable. I bought 3 pair and will be taking the two unopened pair back.

My husband loved the forerunner of these pants that he bought in the past years. They were durable for a guy who works outside and comfortable. When I bought this to replace the ones he has worn out, they turned out to be a lot lighter in weight. How they will wear will be determining factor on whether we buy more or look for a different brand.

My last pair ripped along seam of my butt. Hoping it was maybe just one defective pair, I bought another pair and they are probably 2-3 months old and they ripped in the exact same place. Otherwise, I like the jeans, they fits well, are comfortable too, but the quality just isn't there. No fun having your underwear showing while at work LOL (and I have an office/desk job so I'm not really abusing the jeans).

Have bought MM jeans for years. They were comfortable and durable. Ordered these and tried them on and realized they are completely different. Too tight around the crotch and skinny around the legs and calf. They are definitely not relaxed fit. More like spandex. Unfortunately will need to return. Bring back the previous version, please!