I purchased this product previously and it was much more comfortable. It was made in Mexico then. The new product is made in Bangladesh. The jeans are probably made using less material. They are too tight and feel shorter from crotch to belt loop. I am sure the less material suggestion is correct since the previous jeans made in Mexico have seven belt loops and these new jeans have five belt loops. Please bring back the original jeans even if you have to charge more for extra material.

These were so bad I had to get a refund. The problem was one I never encountered before. After washing them twice they still stunk. The smell was so bad that they stunk up the utility room and the smell got over all the clothes being washed. We had to wash them again. The smell was like oil from a mechanics garage. Don't take the chance

Pair of pants

I really liked these jeans... Until someone decided to eliminate 2 of the belt loops and charge more for less. SMH... Why mess with something that isn't broken? It is a real shame that someone who probably doesn't even wear these jeans was allowed to ruin a perfectly good product by making it less than it was, and then turning around and charging more for it..!? I don't mind paying the increased price, just put back the 2 missing belt loops. In their original design (with 7 belt loops), these jeans could easily compare and compete with some higher end brands. Now, with only 5 belt loops, they can't keep the belt from sliding off waist of the jeans and onto your skin or tucked-in shirt. Now they wear and look cheap. Please, please restore the original 7 belt-loop design for me and the other men who will not take the time to write a review and will just buy their jeans from your competitors. Thank you for your attention and consideration.

I have been wearing Members Mark for years, love them....UNTIL I bought two pair a few weeks ago. First thing I noticed was the missing belt loops. Seriously. Those belt loops allow the jeans to fit better and keep the belt off your skin. But the feel is terrible. I thought they needed to be worn and washed a couple of times. Still hated them. Then I read the label. Stretch material is incorporated into the fabric. Nope, they are going back. Totally messed up a great pair of jeans. Will have to find another brand that feels better than this.

These jeans seem to be well-made and sturdy. My only issue is that the rise is shorter than that of name-brand jeans. They weren't advertised as low-rise and I don't think they are. They are somewhere between mid-rise and low-rise. Just a little uncomfortable.

These jeans seem nice and would have loved to buy 7 pairs, but after trying 2 different sizes the inseam is so short they wouldn’t stay up around the waist/hips. Also, the Mt Pleasant Mi store’s display didn’t have any organization of the jeans,you had search through each pile to find your size. I told the clerk and she said she’d take care of that. I went back a week later to the same mess

I bought 2 pairs of these jeans for my son in size 40x30. He work in a job where he needs to bend over or stoop to move things. The first time he stooped over wearing jeans they shredded up the back seam. It was embarrassing for him to have this happen at work. I needed to take him a replacement pair of pants so he could finish the workday. The 2nd pair started to shred up the back the same way. They are both on my discard pile -- not even worth donating. Clearly, these jeans are made of low-quality synthetic material, not the 98% cotton that is claimed on the label. I have never seen genuine cotton shred like cheap polyester. If you need something durable, skip these jeans and buy a better quality pair that is a name brand.

I have been buying Members Mark jeans from Sam's Club for many years because they were less expensive than brand name jeans and they have been a quality product. I recently bought 3 of these newly designed jeans and although the stretch fabric is comfortable, the design has three shortcomings. The least of these is the elimination of one of the belt loops in the rear. Next is the pockets aren't as deep as the former design. Finally, the worst is the zipper is shorter than the previous design making it difficult and uncomfortable for men to use the bathroom. I will not buy anymore of these unless the zipper is made longer.

I bought two pair to try them out. I was a big fan of the previous version and was hoping these would be a good alternative. Boy was I wrong. These felt tight in the legs and were not nearly as comfortable as the previous Member's Mark Levis. But the worst was both pair blew out the back side. I have never had pants do that. It took very little force as I was not aware they were ripped until I took them off and saw the huge tare. So embarrassing I was walking around in public like that.