These are nice boxer briefs. Our son typically prefers nylon or polyester for the softer feel, but he said these are exceptionally soft. They are a cotton and polyester mix (with recycled polyester, which is nice). We will see how he likes them in the warmer weather.

I am usually pretty picky when it comes to my underwear so was pretty skeptical when I got these. I was so surprised. The fabric was soft but also stretchable, breathable with just enough support, the waistband was just the right thickness to support without bunching, they were long enough to prevent chafing but not so long that they bunched up, and to top it off tag printed on the fabric. The only concern I could even bring up would be whether they would hold up after multiple washes. Great product!

At first, I was a little apprehensive trying the Member's Mark boxer briefs, but after receiving them I noticed how soft they were. After using the boxer briefs, I noticed how comfortable and stretchy they are. I actually prefer these boxer briefs over the other major name brands.

These are so comfortable. The material is soft and the fit is absolutely great. Washcare instructions are to machine wash cold and low tumble dry. The material seems a bit thin in case someone prefers thicker fabric. It has a fly front and the waistband is really comfortable.

I have not always been a fan of boxer briefs, but I love the feel of these Members Mark ones. They are thin enough so as not to be too bulky under your pants. I also like the fact that the bag was sealed at the top by the size sticker. That might sound crazy, but it ensures that these were never opened.

Well, not bad. They are comfortable and soft. Fit good and are not too snug. So far so good move and stretch enough to be comfortable but not restrictive. They are nice underwear, they don’t bunch up and move with your motions well. Suitable for work.

The Member's Mark Men's 5-Pack Cotton Stretch Boxer Briefs offer great value for the price. Made with a cotton-spandex blend, these boxer briefs are soft, breathable, and have just the right amount of stretch for all-day comfort. The fit is snug without being restrictive, and they hold their shape even after multiple washes. The waistband is comfortable and doesn't roll down. Overall, a solid, affordable choice for everyday wear.

recently purchased the Member’s Mark 5-Pack Cotton Stretch Boxer Briefs in size XL (black). Overall, they’re decent for the price, but not perfect. The cotton material feels soft right out of the package and has a comfortable stretch. The waistband sits well and doesn’t dig in, which I appreciate. The fit in XL is mostly true to size, though they run slightly snug after washing. Where they fall a little short is in durability and support. After a few washes, I noticed some minor stretching in the fabric and slight loosening in the leg openings. They’re fine for everyday wear, but I wouldn’t say they feel premium. Also, breathability could be better during long days or workouts. For the value and quantity, they’re a solid budget option. Just don’t expect high-end performance or long-term durability. Would I buy again? Maybe — especially for the price — but I’d also consider trying other brands for comparison.

These underwear are okay, but there are a couple of features that could use improvement. The feel and material are generally comfortable and they appear to be well-made. I found the wastband material a bit firm for my taste, with a 'paperiness' to it. A softer wasteband would be a huge improvement. I also found that the longer i wore them the more 'stretchy' they seem to become, which could be a bit of concern on long strenuous days or active lifestyle. And that does lead me to wonder how they will hold up over time. Overall, they get the job done. But there are more comfortable and durable options out there.

Package was returned by someone else, I brought it believing they were size large since they were in the large bin, when I got home and opened the package they were size small. No size anywhere on the package. I found out when i returned them that the size was on a part of the package that had been torn off , and size is not anywhere else on the packaging. Size should be on front and back of package, poor packaging design.